A Manifesto for Free Appliances
Just as there is a need for Free Software, there is a need for free (as in speech) appliances.
Free Appliances can be modified or enhanced using GNU/Linux tools or other Open Source Software, preferably licensed as GPLv3. They have no binaries without source code. They adhere to generally accepted standards as much as possible. Their documentation is open. They favor open file formats since information in open file formats should not require DRM. They do not use proprietary components when there are generic ones widely available. (For example: batteries should be replaceable.)
We need to know that products that we use have no hidden functionality and that we can enjoy their full capability and value. They must be open because that is the only way their functionality can be peer-reviewed, verified, and audited. That should assure that no malware has been introduced. In the event that user modifications go wrong, there must be a simple user reset of the device to its original state.
When manufacturers are unreceptive to this approach, there can be considerable effort required at reverse engineering. Some of the problems are evident at the Free Software Foundation (FSF) Free Bios project. If sufficient numbers of people agree, there should be no problem finding manufacturers who will want to serve this market. Consumers could insist for good reason and there will be no problem persuading them if they know the facts.
Manufacturers with products that meet these requirements are invited to submit specifications to info at freeappliances dot org. Having done that, the product may display the Free Appliance logo (Design suggestions welcome.) and will be listed and linked on this site.
Links
The Need.
Closed, proprietary products lack interoperability, auditability, extensibility, robustness, security and, too often, quality.
Such products are accompanied by long EULAs (End User License Agreements) which you must sign to actually use the product. If you do not agree, you are legally not allowed to use the product. In the case of Microsoft operating systems, such an agreement could prohibit you from using your own computer. Audio CDs are accompanied by these agreements and they may have software that prevents you from using your disk drive freely. In the past there have been root kits that compromise security. Copy protection schemes have been used that allow monitoring of consumer behavior, compromise computer security, render drives useless, and can result in computer breakdown and repair expense.
A hard drive failure can cause re-install of all software, renewal of all licenses, re-purchase of subscriptions, loss of data, recovery of passwords, and so on.
The DefectiveByDesign website has identified products that are not consumer friendly. Although Defective By Design is mostly concerned with DRM, other examples include Vista, and there are others. Digital Video recorders are made in such a way that viewers listening habits can be monitored remotely. Microsoft Office and other MS products phone home.
Voting machines are a more serious threat because they are hackable, have known security risks, and may not count properly as a result. Even though such machines are a threat to everything that we hold dear, a number of companies insist that their code is proprietary, that their product is not open to audit or to standards that could minimize the risk. Proprietary voting machines are dangerous. It is not just about freedom in products, it is also about personal freedom from search, surveillance, or unwarranted supervision. See Open Voting Foundation. Also see this.