You would think that if something is free, that demand for it would be high
to unlimited. In the most commonly used areas free software is better, for
multi-media work proprietary problems slow development, but applications
are getting better all the time.
How would you feel if you bought a car, but were prohibited from working on
it ?
How often do you have to agree to End User License Agreements (EULAs) that
you may need a lawyer to fully interpret, that you barely have time to read
because you have your own work to do, and you cannot proceed without agreeing.
Feels like extortion doesn't it ? This does not happen with free software. You
are not interrupted to determine if your software is legal or paid up. You do
get polite notifications when upgrades are available.
Formats are open and standard. Older versions of documents
stored as Microsoft word files are no longer supported and you may no longer be
able to read them. Since the format is encumbered by patents, you are pretty
much bound to the whim of the MS developments. MP3 files, JPEGs, and many other
formats are also proprietary and subject to change at the whim of the vendor. Public domain, standard formats
are important.
Free software has transparency that allows it to be fully audited. Because anyone can access, examine, explore and modify the source code, This should be a
requirement for at least some applications...like
voting machines. Manufacturers of voting machines are all right-wing partisans, and they insist
that the software on their machines is a proprietary, trade secret. You can't
see it and it is not auditable as a result. Yes, they can steal
elections. As voters we need to insist on open
source.
Performance is better. Aside from the fact that it is cost free, it is
faster, and it will not bug you with EULAs and subscription fees.
Free software is more secure.
Free software is more extensible. It is possible to build on software that is
already written. Because it is Open, it can be peer reviewed, modified, and used
for still further development.
Free software is auditable. Hidden traps can be exposed as long as the
code is completely open.
Free software has been getting easier to use and there are now distributions friendly enough for most consumers. (I just
installed Ubuntu 8.10 with almost no effort.)
Since everyone is facing massive budget cuts: consumers, schools, all levels
of government, we can get better
results for far less money by going to free software.
The GNU Project defends software freedom: the
user's freedom to run it for any purpose, share it with neighbors, improve it
for your own purposes, modify it and redistribute your modifications for the
benefit of the whole community.
Eban Moglan: How I discovered Free Software and Met RMS
Commercial software appears to the consumer as a black box.
You do not know what is inside it. Eban Moglan spoke to the Free Software
Foundation:
"This is really about who is going to have the keys
to the home next decade. ...At what point do you want to admit onto your network
... computers which run software you can't see, can't understand, can't control
and which reports to other people what is going on your network without your
ability to interrupt or do anything? What point do you want to bring a box like
that home and put it down on the desk that your child needs to do his homework?
...Those boxes, general purpose computers, running software you can't see, can't
control, ...are called intruders. Do you want to have an intruder in every room
of your house in ten years or don't you... ?"
Standards
Standardized formats that are open are necessary for long-term accessibility.
Government (and everybody else) should insist on open formats for their
long-term IT documents.
Once you begin exploring the thousands of applications
that are now available, you begin to wonder why you ever actually paid for
software. Some of the best include:
There is a proliferation of
distributions, and that is partly because there
are different concerns addressed by each of them. Some are for old machines,
others for small ones, some for freedom from proprietary ties, many have
proprietary hooks, and so on.
Many you can try without even installing by
booting from a live cd.
Download a free, live CD from these websites. Burn the CD as an iso, then run it directly from your CDROM
drive without even installing. Running from the CD will be somewhat slow, but actual installation will improve performance considerably. If you have a slow internet connection, it could be easier to buy cds from a
good vendor: for example,
LinuxCollections or frozentech sells them for a nominal fee.
Pick one, and do not attempt to mix any components from
others unless you know exactly what you are doing.
Ubuntu may be the best distribution for the new multi-media user.
See videos.
Knoppix may be the easiest live CD to boot. It has very good hardware
detection and it can be an excellent diagnostic tool.
Debian is the parent of the best distributions. Choose the stable version if
you are not adventurous.
Mepis
DSL: Damn Small Linux can bring an older machine back.
Puppy Linux
64Studio: optimized for audio, but a branch of Debian. There is a 32 bit
version that can run on many late-model PCs. Hardware detection (December 2008)
is lacking.
The distributions that are most free are:
All of the above distributions have some compromises in their use of
non-free software. The most freedom is from
Distributions recommended by the FSF
Free, in this case, means no proprietary software components. If you choose
one of these distributions, some functionality may not be available (including
newer media since many include DRM.)